Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Harris v. California

374 U.S. 499

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1963-06-17
Topic: bankruptcy

374 U.S. 499 (1963) HARRIS v. CALIFORNIA ET AL. No. 135, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 17, 1963.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Harris v. California. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

374 U.S. 499 (1963)

HARRIS
v.
CALIFORNIA ET AL.

No. 135, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 17, 1963. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.