Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Harlan v. Harlan

Harlan v. Harlan, 263 U.S. 681 (1923)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1923-12-03
Topic: general

Per Curiam. This case has become moot, because of the institution of the second suit in the Supreme *682Court of the District of Columbia, and the passing of the property involved to the receiver in that suit, with the consent of the plaintiff in this. The cause is therefore remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to modify its previous decree and enter an order remanding the cause to the Supreme Court of the District directing it to dismiss the case as moot, awarding no costs to either party. United States v. Hamburg-American Co., 239 U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Harlan v. Harlan. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

Per Curiam.

This case has become moot, because of the institution of the second suit in the Supreme *682 Court of the District of Columbia, and the passing of the property involved to the receiver in that suit, with the consent of the plaintiff in this. The cause is therefore remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to modify its previous decree and enter an order remanding the cause to the Supreme Court of the District directing it to dismiss the case as moot, awarding no costs to either party. United States v. Hamburg-American Co., 239 U. S. 466, 475; Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. Compañia General, 249 U. S. 425, 426-7; Heitmuller v. Stokes, 256 U. S. 359, 362; Atherton Mills v. Johnston, 259 U. S. 13, 15-16.

Mr. Henry E. Davis for appellant. Mr. Henry S. Bobbins for appellee.