Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Hallam v. Grant
Hallam v. Grant, 280 U.S. 522 (1929)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1929-11-25
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- noting that, even though “the witness apparently contradicted himself in several particulars[,] whether from confusion or otherwise,” the factfinder was still entitled to rely on his testimony
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hallam v. Grant. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to proceed further' herein in forma pauperis is denied, for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the unprinted record herein submitted, finds that there is no substantial federal question upon which a writ of certiorari can be issued. The petition for a writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.