Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Guevara-Torres v. United States

533 U.S. 953

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2001-06-29
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • applying 2G2.4(c)(2) to defendant who conceded that he “sen[t] and received” images of child pornography on his computer
  • “By using the term ‘imminent,’ Congress indicated that it wanted to include a safety valve for the ‘three strikes’ rule to prevent impending harms, not those harms that had already occurred.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Guevara-Torres v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
47 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.