Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. United States
389 U.S. 216
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1967-12-04
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- requiring school construction and consolidation, hiring and placement of teachers, school transportation, desegregation plans for local school systems, equalization of faculties; but no finding or directive regarding superintendents
- continued state aid to segregated private school will render such school a state actor and subject it to state-wide segregation order
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 90 opinions
19 L.Ed.2d 422
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
v.
UNITED STATES et al.
No. 555.
Supreme Court of the United States
October Term 1967.
December 4, 1967
Amos Mathews and Robert J. Bernard, for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Raymond M. Zimmet, for appellees the United States and others.
John L. Arrington, Jr., for appellee Missouri, Kansas & Oklahoma Coach Lines.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.