Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Greenwald v. Maryland

Greenwald v. Md., 363 U.S. 721 (1960)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1960-06-20
Topic: general

Per Curiam. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Greenwald v. Maryland. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

GREENWALDv. MARYLAND,363 U.S. 721(1960)

GREENWALDv. MARYLAND.

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.

No. 920.

Decided June 20, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question.

Reported below:221 Md. 245,157 A.2d 119.

Harry Silbert, A. Jerome DienerandSidney Schlachmanfor appellant.C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland,Stedman Prescott, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, andJames H. Norris, Jr., Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question.Page 812