Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Green v. Philadelphia Housing Authority
522 U.S. 816
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1997-10-06
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- remanding the case for a determination of reasonable attorney’s fees even though no independent allowable § 503(b)(3) expense was mentioned
- employee’s presence at the bail hearing of an alleged organized crime boss was protected
- Section 503(b)(3)(D) "requires the judge to distinguish between expenses incurred in making a substantial contribution to the case and expenses lacking that causal connection, the latter being noncompensable.”
- “Use of the word ‘shall’ connotes a mandatory intent”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Green v. Philadelphia Housing Authority. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 44 opinions
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.