Gozlon-Peretz v. United States

invalidating state's new reimbursement plan which resulted in cutting provider reimbursement by 46% across the board | invalidating state’s new reimbursement plan which resulted in cutting provider reimbursement by 46% across the board | “The state agency’s determination of procedural and substantive compliance with federal law is not entitled to the deference afforded a federal agency!” | “change in payment rates under the state plan requires the state Medicaid agency to submit the plan amendment to HCFA for approval.” | defendant — independent security firm whose “drug-sniffing” dog acted in manner causing police officer to apply for and receive search warrant — neither “state actor”, nor hable, in § 1983 lawsuit