Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Gouge v. Hart

Gouge v. Hart, 251 U.S. 542 (1920)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1920-01-19
Topic: general

Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Courtney v. Pradt, 196 U. S. 89, 91; Farrugia v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gouge v. Hart. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of

jurisdiction upon the authority of Courtney v. Pradt, 196 U. S. 89, 91; Farrugia v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co., 233 U, S. 352, 353; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. *543 Western Union Telegraph Co., 234 U. S. 369, 371-372; Male v. Atchison, Topeka & Sarda Fe Ry. Co., 240 U. S. 97, 99. Mr. J. S. Ashworth, with whom Mr. H. G. Peters was on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Frierson, with whom The Solicitor General was on the brief, for appellees.