Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Gonzales v. United States

Gonzales v. United States, 553 U.S. 242 (2008)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2008-12-08
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that defense counsel may decide whether to consent to voir dire proceedings before a federal magistrate
  • noting that when the magistrate judge acts under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3), “the district judge ... is waiting in the wings, fully able to correct errors”
  • stating that when a magistrate conducts voir dire, "the district judge — insulated by life tenure and irreducible salary — is waiting in the wings, fully able to correct errors”
  • permitting magistrate judge to conduct jury selection without an explicit personal statement of consent
  • "[S]ome basic trial choices are so important that an attorney must seek the client's consent in order to waive the right."
  • "What suffices for waiver depends on the nature of the right at issue." (internal quotation marks omitted).
  • “[A] scheduling matter ... is a tactical decision that is well suited for the attorney’s own decision.”
  • "[Sjome basic trial choices are so important that an attorney must seek the client's consent in order to waive the right.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gonzales v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
76 opinions

GEORGE J. GONZALES
v.
UNITED STATES

No. 08-7119

Supreme Court of United States.

December 8, 2008.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.