Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Gold Cross Ambulance Co. v. Kansas City

471 U.S. 1003

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1985-04-01
Topic
general

zoning ordinance which limited commercial development on certain land and thereby diminished land’s value did not effect a taking | continuing failure to register with Selective Service was a separate offense | “Unilateral expectation of being awarded a license is insufficient to sustain [a] procedural due process claim.” | “regulation by the City itself satisfies the active supervision requirement ... since its regulation of ambulance service is exercised under the authorization and direction of state policy.” | “regulation by the City itself satisfies the active supervision requirement ... since its regulation of ambulance service is exercised under the authorization and direction of state policy.” | state action immunity shielded city from liability from awarding contract for redevelopment to private developer and from zoning ordinances restricting commercial development of outlying areas | interstate sale of revenue bonds, among other things, meets “effect-on-commerce” jurisdictional requirement | ambulance service operated by city hospital | ambulance service operated by city hospital

Citator

Cited by
45 opinions

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.