Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Gideon v. Riverside Community College District

Gideon v. Riverside Cmty. Coll. Dist., 480 U.S. 919 (1987)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1987-03-09
Topic
general

judgment n.o.v. is only proper when the evidence is so strong that reasonable minds could not differ as to what the evidence showed | judgment n.o.v. is only proper when the evidence is so strong that reasonable minds could not differ as to what the evidence showed | personal beliefs, conjecture and speculation are insufficient to support an inference of age discrimination. | “To make out a prima facie case, the plaintiff must show that he was in the protected age group (40-70), that he was discharged, that he was qualified for the position and that he was replaced by a younger person.” | "To make out a prima facie case, the plaintiff must show that he was in the protected age group (40-70), that he was discharged, that he was qualified for the position and that he was replaced by a younger person."

Citator

Cited by
41 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.