Geske & Sons, Inc. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150

holding that the arbitration procedures prescribed under the RLA are not appellants’ sole forums for resolution of their claims under the Federal Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794 | applying New York’s three-year statute of limitations for personal injuries to a private action under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act | District Court for the Western District of New York found no authority for broadening of the doctrine to include seemingly inconsistent legal positions | “settlement neither requires nor implies any judicial aceeptance of either party’s claims or theories, and thus a settlement does not provide the prior success necessary for judicial estoppel” | “I still think it [a complete injunction] is an appropriate way to go” | unauthorized practice rule is not vague in all its applications because “[t]here are some activities which clearly constitute the practice of law, such as representing another person at trial or signing legal documents filed in court on behalf of another person”