Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Georgia State Board of Examiners of Optometry v. Mott

Ga. State Bd. of Exam’rs of Optometry v. Mott, 248 U.S. 541 (1918)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1918-12-23
Topic
general

Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of .§ 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 726. See Marshall v. Dye, 231 U. S. 250; Stewart v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Georgia State Board of Examiners of Optometry v. Mott. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of .§ 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 726. See Marshall v. Dye, 231 U. S. 250; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14.