Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Geisinger v. Board of County Commissioners
55 L. Ed. 2d 496
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1978-02-27
- Topic
- general
"the giving of multiple `Allen' charges is to be avoided and may constitute reversible error..." | “the preferable rule is to uphold the trial judge’s exercise of discretion unless he acts arbitrarily or irrationally” | jury instructed that "[i]t is important that a decision ... be reached here, and I really see no good reasons why a decision cannot be reached" | harmless error analysis applies when trial judge answers jury's note without defendant or his counsel being present | second deadlock instruction upheld after an 11-1 split for conviction, known to the trial court, continued and a signed note by the holdout juror delivered to the court | jury instructed that “[i]t is important that a decision ... be reached here, and I really see no good reasons why a decision cannot be reached” | introduction of gun to establish bank robbery defendant’s identity and opportunity, held permissible | affirming decision to give second modified Allen charge | two ABA instructions not reversible error
Citator
- Cited by
- 72 opinions
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.