Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Gary S. Et Ux., Individually and on Behalf of Their Son, Andrew S. v. Manchester School District
543 U.S. 988
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2004-11-15
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that a judge’s general interest as a resident, taxpayer, and property owner does not require recusal in cases where the local sheriffs department was a party
- “To state an equal protection claim, [plaintiff] must allege that ‘through state action, similarly situated persons have been treated disparately’ ... and put forth evidence that [defendant’s] actions were motivated by race”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gary S. Et Ux., Individually and on Behalf of Their Son, Andrew S. v. Manchester School District. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 22 opinions
GARY S. ET UX., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THEIR SON, ANDREW S.
v.
MANCHESTER SCHOOL DISTRICT.
No. 04-418.
Supreme Court of United States.
November 15, 2004.
1
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 374 F. 3d 15.