Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Garment District, Inc. v. Belk Stores Services, Inc.

486 U.S. 1005

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1988-05-16
Topic
commercial

where the court in applying the Monsanto standard held that termination may be justified in order to avoid losing a disgruntled customer | named plaintiff must have suffered the same type injury of those he purports to represent | named plaintiff must. have suffered the same type injury of those he purports to represent | where the court in applying the Monsanto standard held that termination may be justified in order to avoid losing a disgruntled customer | no anticompetitive agreement could be inferred where manufacturer and distributor pursued different goals | “In light of Falcon, general statistical evidence of underrepresentation in the workforce will undoubtedly not suffice to justify a single class covering different types of discrimination such as in hiring, promotion, and discharge.” | small player had little effect on wood-burning stove market | small player had little effect on wood-burning stove market

Citator

Cited by
29 opinions

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.