Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Garment District, Inc. v. Belk Stores Services, Inc.
486 U.S. 1005
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1988-05-16
- Topic
- commercial
where the court in applying the Monsanto standard held that termination may be justified in order to avoid losing a disgruntled customer | named plaintiff must have suffered the same type injury of those he purports to represent | named plaintiff must. have suffered the same type injury of those he purports to represent | where the court in applying the Monsanto standard held that termination may be justified in order to avoid losing a disgruntled customer | no anticompetitive agreement could be inferred where manufacturer and distributor pursued different goals | “In light of Falcon, general statistical evidence of underrepresentation in the workforce will undoubtedly not suffice to justify a single class covering different types of discrimination such as in hiring, promotion, and discharge.” | small player had little effect on wood-burning stove market | small player had little effect on wood-burning stove market
Citator
- Cited by
- 29 opinions
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.