Garber v. Los Angeles Municipal Court

stating that a union “cannot acquiesce in a company’s prohibited employment discrimination and expect to evade Title VII liability . . .” | stating that where the alleged retaliation “occurs prior to the filing of a charge and the employee fails to allege the retaliatory act or a retaliation claim in the subsequent charge, the retaliatory act ordinarily will not reasonably relate to the charge” | the seventeen-year-old defendant kidnaped the victim while stealing his truck, drove him to a secluded area, and shot him three times in the head | defendant kidnaped the victim while stealing his truck and ultimately drove him to a secluded area and shot him three times in the head | defendant kidnapped the victim while stealing his truck and ultimately drove him to a secluded area and shot him three times in the head | The seventeen year old defendant kidnaped the victim while stealing his truck and ultimately drove him to a secluded area and shot him three times in the head | a plaintiff may seek judicial consideration of discrimination claims not identified in EEOC charge if omitted claims are reasonably related to the allegations in the charge | unpublished case in the Section 303 context in which Fifth Circuit held that claim arising from an unstayed judgment was not the subject of a bona fide dispute, but which Fifth Circuit indicated had no precedential value | testimony of debtor as to debts owed