Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Gallop v. United States

487 U.S. 1211

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1988-06-20
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that arrest of suspect was supported by eyewitness identification of suspect by assailant at scene of crime
  • applying Strickland and holding trial counsel’s concession of defendant’s guilt of murder, but not capital murder, during closing arguments in face of overwhelming proof was tactical decision
  • other crime directly preceded and led to the crime charged, therefore evidence of the other crime was interrelated and inseparable from the charged crime; exceptions listed in M.R.E. 404(b) not exclusive
  • other crimes evidence admissible when necessary to tell a rational and coherent story
  • indictment alleged use of a gun; held to be sufficient without further proof of what type of gun had been used
  • veniremember "wore a hat in the courtroom . . . and his general demeanor suggested to the prosecutor that he was unstable, unconcerned, and had no respect for the proceedings"
  • “The fact that a witness cannot 9 give a positive identification of another person goes to the weight of his testimony, not to its admissibility; therefore, the lack of positive identification is a jury issue.”
  • motion to substitute made 5 days before trial

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gallop v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
245 opinions

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White would grant certiorari.