Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Gallop v. United States
487 U.S. 1211
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1988-06-20
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that arrest of suspect was supported by eyewitness identification of suspect by assailant at scene of crime
- applying Strickland and holding trial counsel’s concession of defendant’s guilt of murder, but not capital murder, during closing arguments in face of overwhelming proof was tactical decision
- other crime directly preceded and led to the crime charged, therefore evidence of the other crime was interrelated and inseparable from the charged crime; exceptions listed in M.R.E. 404(b) not exclusive
- other crimes evidence admissible when necessary to tell a rational and coherent story
- indictment alleged use of a gun; held to be sufficient without further proof of what type of gun had been used
- veniremember "wore a hat in the courtroom . . . and his general demeanor suggested to the prosecutor that he was unstable, unconcerned, and had no respect for the proceedings"
- “The fact that a witness cannot 9 give a positive identification of another person goes to the weight of his testimony, not to its admissibility; therefore, the lack of positive identification is a jury issue.”
- motion to substitute made 5 days before trial
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gallop v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 245 opinions
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice White would grant certiorari.