Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
GALINDO-PENA v. Gonzales
549 U.S. 1093
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2006-12-11
- Topic
- general
127 S.Ct. 828 (2006) 549 U.S. 1093 Raul GALINDO-PENA, petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General. Alfonso Acosta-Grimaldo, petitioner, v. Alberto R.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed GALINDO-PENA v. Gonzales. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 8 opinions
127 S.Ct. 828 (2006) 549 U.S. 1093
Raul GALINDO-PENA, petitioner,
No. 05-1276.
Raul GALINDO-PENA, petitioner,
v.
Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General.
Alfonso Acosta-Grimaldo, petitioner,
v.
Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General.
No. 05-1276.
Supreme Court of United States.
December 11, 2006.On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. 47, 127 S.Ct. 625, 166 L.Ed.2d 462 (2006).