Gable v. Sames

determining one not a party to the franchise agreement cannot be liable under the Dealer's Act | distributor’s alleged harassment of dealer, including wrongful accusations and lies, presented jury issue as to whether distributor had engaged in conduct which is arbitrary, in bad faith or unconscionable | defendant could not object to jury’s reasonable interpretation of plaintiffs damages evidence after the fact when it could have come forward with its own evidence | a computer sheet containing summaries of inventory and sales was not newly discovered evidence since the information was otherwise obtainable from other sources at the first trial | sole stockholder of corporate dealership who had personally guaranteed corporate obligations lacked standing | question of release’s validity submitted to jury