Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Fugate v. New Mexico
470 U.S. 904
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1985-05-13
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- affirming by an equally divided Court
- affirmed by an equally divided Supreme Court
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Fugate v. New Mexico. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 18 opinions
470 U.S. 904 (1985)
FUGATE
No. 83-6663.
FUGATE
v.
NEW MEXICO
No. 83-6663.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued February 19, 1985 Decided March 26, 1985 CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICOJ. Thomas Sullivan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Henry R. Quintero.
Paul Bardacke, Attorney General of New Mexico, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs was Anthony Tupler, Assistant Attorney General.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.