Froude v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.

as modified, holding that coverage is triggered when "asbestos-related disease became reasonably capable of medical diagnosis" | policy triggered by claim that asbestos related disease has manifested itself during the policy period | in which a search under similar circumstances was held not to violate the defendant’s fourth amendment rights | injury occurs when it first becomes apparent to the injured party | manifestation is the trigger for asbestos-related bodily injury under Ohio law | manifestation is the trigger for asbestos-related bodily injury under Ohio law | disposition of case cannot be legally binding on nonparties | manifestation of disease triggers coverage