Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Frezzo Bros. v. United States

Frezzo Bros. v. United States, 62 L. Ed. 2d 756 (1980)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1980-02-19
Topic
general

having established that district court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, petitioner "faces the additional hurdle of showing that mandamus is the appropriate remedy" | finding no cost-plus equivalent where gasoline retailers were forced to vary their prices in relation to fixed wholesale prices | finding no cost-plus equivalent where gasoline retailers were forced to vary their prices in relation to fixed wholesale prices | “Absent some indication that the antagonism between co-defendants misled or confused the jury, the mere fact that co-defendants blame each other does not compel severance” | “Absent some indication that the antagonism between co-defendants misled or confused the jury, the mere fact that co-defendants attempt to blame each other does not compel severance.” | “a future injury of uncertain date and incalculable magnitude is irreparable harm, and protection from such an injury is a legitimate end of injunctive rehef’ | state court had issued broad injunction against a boycott organized to protest racial discrimination | corporate defendant fined; individual defendants fined and sentenced to thirty days in jail | exhaustion requirement permits agency to make decisions within its areas of expertise

Citator

Cited by
126 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.