Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Frezzo Bros. v. United States
Frezzo Bros. v. United States, 62 L. Ed. 2d 756 (1980)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1980-02-19
- Topic
- general
having established that district court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, petitioner "faces the additional hurdle of showing that mandamus is the appropriate remedy" | finding no cost-plus equivalent where gasoline retailers were forced to vary their prices in relation to fixed wholesale prices | finding no cost-plus equivalent where gasoline retailers were forced to vary their prices in relation to fixed wholesale prices | “Absent some indication that the antagonism between co-defendants misled or confused the jury, the mere fact that co-defendants blame each other does not compel severance” | “Absent some indication that the antagonism between co-defendants misled or confused the jury, the mere fact that co-defendants attempt to blame each other does not compel severance.” | “a future injury of uncertain date and incalculable magnitude is irreparable harm, and protection from such an injury is a legitimate end of injunctive rehef’ | state court had issued broad injunction against a boycott organized to protest racial discrimination | corporate defendant fined; individual defendants fined and sentenced to thirty days in jail | exhaustion requirement permits agency to make decisions within its areas of expertise
Citator
- Cited by
- 126 opinions
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.