Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Figueroa v. LeFevre

444 U.S. 996

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1979-12-10
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that Senator Goldwater’s claim that the Constitution required Senate agreement to abrogate a treaty raised a political question
  • holding a senator’s challenge to the president’s decision to withdraw from a treaty nonjusticiable
  • vacating, with instructions to dismiss, an attack on the President’s action in terminating a treaty with Taiwan
  • describing the Supreme Court’s analysis of legislator standing in Raines v. Byrd, 521 U.S. 811, 117 S. Ct. 2312, 138 L. Ed. 2d 849 (1997
  • finding nonjusticiable a suit by members of Congress challenging the President’s power to determine how to terminate a treaty with Taiwan because the suit touched upon foreign relations
  • construing Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 221, 82 S.Ct. 691, 712, 7 L.Ed.2d 663 (1962)
  • finding a political question on the process for ratification or recision of a treaty
  • four-justice plurality concluding that' a challenge to the President’s unilateral termination of a treaty presents a political question

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Figueroa v. LeFevre. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
188 opinions

ante, p. 850 ;

ante, p. 821; and

U. S. Circuit Judges, ante, p. 821. Motions for leave to file petitions for rehearing denied.