Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
Fibreboard Paper Prods. Corp. v. Nat’l Labor Rels. Bd., 375 U.S. 963 (1964)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1964-01-06
- Topic
- general
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted limited to Questions 1 and 3 presented by the petition which read as follows: “1. Was Petitioner required by the National Labor Relations Act to bargain with a union representing some of its employees about whether to let to an independent contractor for legitimate business reasons the performance of certain operations in which those employees had been engaged? “3. Was the Board, in a case involving only a refusal to bargain, empowered to order the resumption of operations which had been discontinued for legitimate business reasons and reinstatement with back pay of the individuals formerly employed therein?” Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted limited to Questions 1 and 3 presented by the petition which read as follows:
“1. Was Petitioner required by the National Labor Relations Act to bargain with a union representing some of its employees about whether to let to an independent contractor for legitimate business reasons the performance of certain operations in which those employees had been engaged?
“3. Was the Board, in a case involving only a refusal to bargain, empowered to order the resumption of operations which had been discontinued for legitimate business reasons and reinstatement with back pay of the individuals formerly employed therein?”Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.