Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Feldman v. United States
502 U.S. 1099
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1992-02-24
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- contract gave the insurance company the right periodically and unilaterally to change the prospective interest rate
- fraud occurs only when a person of ordinary prudence and comprehension would rely on misrepresentations; no reasonable person would rely on puffery that an investment will earn the "highest" rate of return
- contract gave insurer right to alter interest rate to beneficiaries’ disadvantage
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Feldman v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 36 opinions
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.