Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Federal Trade Commission v. American Crayon Co.

352 U.S. 806

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1956-10-08
Topic: general

Per Curiam: The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. The case is remanded with directions as follows: (1) to affirm and enforce paragraphs *807numbered 4 and 5 and the unnumbered paragraph following paragraph numbered 5 of the Federal Trade Commission’s order issued pursuant to § 2 (d) of the Clayton Act; and (2) to consider and pass upon the Federal Trade Commission’s petition for affirmance and enforcement of the provisions of paragraphs numbered 1, 2 and 3 of the Federal Trade Commission’s order issued under § 2 (a) of that Act. Simon E. Sobeloff, then Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Daniel M. Friedman, Earl W.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Federal Trade Commission v. American Crayon Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 12 opinions

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. The case is remanded with directions as follows: (1) to affirm and enforce paragraphs *807 numbered 4 and 5 and the unnumbered paragraph following paragraph numbered 5 of the Federal Trade Commission’s order issued pursuant to § 2 (d) of the Clayton Act; and (2) to consider and pass upon the Federal Trade Commission’s petition for affirmance and enforcement of the provisions of paragraphs numbered 1, 2 and 3 of the Federal Trade Commission’s order issued under § 2 (a) of that Act.

Simon E. Sobeloff, then Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Daniel M. Friedman, Earl W. Kintner and Robert B. Dawkins for petitioner. Thomas F. Butler, Jr. for respondent.