Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Farnum v. Committee on Character & Fitness

426 U.S. 943

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1976-06-21
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • “plaintiff must be an active, essential, and knowing participant in the unlawful activity”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Farnum v. Committee on Character & Fitness. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
36 opinions

Appeal from Ct. App. N. Y. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal ivas taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.