Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Ex parte Northern Pacific R.
Ex parte N. Pac. R., 280 U.S. 513 (1929)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1929-10-14
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam: The motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus, and the motion for leave to amend and supplement such petition, are granted. A rule is directed to issue against the respondents, returnable on the first motion day following a period of 30 *514days from this date, directing them to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue in this cause. Messrs. Bruce Scott, H. H.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ex parte Northern Pacific R.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
The motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus, and the motion for leave to amend and supplement such petition, are granted.
A rule is directed to issue against the respondents, returnable on the first motion day following a period of 30