Euroquilt, Inc. v. Scandia Down Corp.

rejecting view that appellate courts should substitute their own view of factual findings based on documentary evidence | rejecting view that appellate courts should substitute their own view of factual findings based on documentary evidence | district courts in trademark cases "possess[ ] substantial discretion to decide how close is too close, once an infringer has committed a contempt of the original injunction" | while words “colorable imitation” leave something to the imagination, Rule 65(d) does not require “a torrent of words” when such would not provide more guidance | district courts in trademark cases “possess[] substantial discretion to decide how close is too close, once an infringer has committed a contempt of the original injunction” | White, ,/., dissenting from the denial of certiorari to resolve whether the determination of likelihood of confusion under section 43(a) is subject to de novo review as a conclusion of law or “clearly erroneous” review as a question of fact | question of likelihood of confusion is "all fact and no law" | question of likelihood of confusion is “all fact and no law”