Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Estate of Van Tran v. Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc.

112 S. Ct. 301

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1991-10-15
Topic
general

holding that in order to grant a Rule 12(c) motion the court must determine beyond doubt that no facts support the plaintiff’s claim | holding remand based on a forum selection clause was not within Sec. 1447(c), hence reviewable, and proper | holding remand based on a forum selection clause was not within § 1447(c), hence reviewable, and proper | remand based upon forum selection clause is non-statutory and rests upon determination that clause has been violated | since “not all non-jurisdictional motions for remand are governed by the 30-day time limit,” a motion to remand made 54 days after removal based upon a forum selection clause is not covered by § 1447(c) | since "not all non-jurisdictional motions for remand are governed by the 30-day time limit," a motion to remand made 54 days after removal based upon a forum selection clause is not covered by § 1447(c)

Citator

Cited by
38 opinions

Sup. Ct. Tex. Certiorari denied.