Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Eshelby v. Watts

Eshelby v. Watts, 191 U.S. 564 (1903)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1903-11-30
Topic: general

In error to the Supreme *565Court of the State of Minnesota. Dismissed with costs, on authority of counsel for plaintiffs in error. November 30, 1903. Mr. Frank B.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Eshelby v. Watts. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

In error to the Supreme *565 Court of the State of Minnesota. Dismissed with costs, on authority of counsel for plaintiffs in error.

November 30, 1903. Mr. Frank B. Kellogg for plaintiffs in error. Mr. H. Steenerson for defendants in error.