Enders v. Esquire Theaters of America, Inc.

holding that a change in the state parole authority’s interpretation of the relevant eligibility provisions was within the reach of the clause because “[a]bsent a court pronouncement on the matter” the agency interpretation had “the force and effect of law” | but cited in Warden v. Marrerro, 417 U.S. 653, 663, 94 S.Ct. 2532, 41 L.Ed.2d 383 (1974) | a state parole authority’s change in the interpretation of a parole eligibility provision is subject to ex post facto constraints because the agency’s interpretation had the effect of law | change in administrative interpretation of parole statute | change in administrative interpretation of parole statute