Efamol, Ltd. v. United States

hiring of younger employee because of changed business circumstances "does not mean that [the defendant] replaced [the plaintiff] in any sense relevant to inferring age-based discrimination” | upholding a verdict of $350,000 for emotional distress damages flowing from the employer-defendant’s violation of the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act | “Spreading the former duties of a terminated employee among the remaining employees does not constitute replacement.”