Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Edmonds v. Virginia

474 U.S. 975

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1985-11-04
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • dealing with qualifications to testify on future dangerousness in a capital case
  • pecuniary gain factor upheld where defendant was at murder scene to rob victims and took a pickup truck
  • where the evidence of the burglary was entwined with the homicides the offenses were properly consolidated
  • no mitigating circumstances found; death penalty affirmed upon findings that killings were done for pecuniary gain and in a depraved manner
  • "While this failure to object does not preclude review in a capital case, it does weigh against any claim of prejudice. "
  • capital murder in the commission of robbery, both future dangerousness and vileness found
  • Florida’s rule against collateral review of matters which should have been raised on direct appeal is an adequate ground under state law to bar federal habeas corpus review
  • prior cases for a discussion of "particularized intent to kill".

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Edmonds v. Virginia. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
261 opinions

Sup. Ct. Va.;

Sup. Ct. Ariz.;

C. A. 11th Cir.; and

Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 85-5417, 229 Va. 303, 329 S. E. 2d 807; No. 85-5478, 145 Ariz. 441, 702 P. 2d 670; No. 85-5486, 764 F. 2d 1371; No. 85-5548, 472 So. 2d 1106.