Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Edmonds v. Virginia
474 U.S. 975
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1985-11-04
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- dealing with qualifications to testify on future dangerousness in a capital case
- pecuniary gain factor upheld where defendant was at murder scene to rob victims and took a pickup truck
- where the evidence of the burglary was entwined with the homicides the offenses were properly consolidated
- no mitigating circumstances found; death penalty affirmed upon findings that killings were done for pecuniary gain and in a depraved manner
- "While this failure to object does not preclude review in a capital case, it does weigh against any claim of prejudice. "
- capital murder in the commission of robbery, both future dangerousness and vileness found
- Florida’s rule against collateral review of matters which should have been raised on direct appeal is an adequate ground under state law to bar federal habeas corpus review
- prior cases for a discussion of "particularized intent to kill".
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Edmonds v. Virginia. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 261 opinions
Sup. Ct. Va.;
Sup. Ct. Ariz.;
C. A. 11th Cir.; and
Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 85-5417, 229 Va. 303, 329 S. E. 2d 807; No. 85-5478, 145 Ariz. 441, 702 P. 2d 670; No. 85-5486, 764 F. 2d 1371; No. 85-5548, 472 So. 2d 1106.