Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Eastman Kodak Co. v. Thomas

528 U.S. 1161

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2000-02-22
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding failure to admonish defendant on his statutory duty to register as sex offender did not invalidate guilty plea
  • “Although it uses the label ‘plus,’ the First Circuit’s ‘pretext plus’ standard does not necessarily require the introduction of additional evidence beyond that required to show pretext.”
  • the stereotypic assumption that "women are not aggressive" along with other “more subtle cognitive phenomena” may infect decision-making
  • at the third stage of the McDonnell Douglas framework "the ultimate burden is on the plaintiff to persuade the trier of fact that she has been treated differently because of [a protected characteristic]”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Eastman Kodak Co. v. Thomas. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
55 opinions

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.