Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Thomas
528 U.S. 1161
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2000-02-22
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding failure to admonish defendant on his statutory duty to register as sex offender did not invalidate guilty plea
- “Although it uses the label ‘plus,’ the First Circuit’s ‘pretext plus’ standard does not necessarily require the introduction of additional evidence beyond that required to show pretext.”
- the stereotypic assumption that "women are not aggressive" along with other “more subtle cognitive phenomena” may infect decision-making
- at the third stage of the McDonnell Douglas framework "the ultimate burden is on the plaintiff to persuade the trier of fact that she has been treated differently because of [a protected characteristic]”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Eastman Kodak Co. v. Thomas. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 55 opinions
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.