Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Dymo Industries, Inc. v. United States

25 L. Ed. 2d 116

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1970-02-27
Topic
general

permitted insolvent P & I policy holder to borrow funds necessary to satisfy policy’s pay first provision | normal practice for the United States Attorney to cause subpoenas to be issued | permitted insolvent shipowner to borrow funds necessary to satisfy policy’s pay first provision | the court allowed an action by an insolvent insured against the insurance company under an indemnity policy when the insured had contracted to satisfy a judgment although the insured had not actually performed the contract | the court allowed an action by an insolvent insured against the insurance company under an indemnity policy when the insured had contracted to satisfy a judgment although the insured had not actually performed the contract | normal practice for the United States Attorney to cause subpoenas to be issued | “the prosecutor is in control of grand jury proceedings”

Citator

Cited by
47 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.