Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Dymo Industries, Inc. v. United States
25 L. Ed. 2d 116
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1970-02-27
- Topic
- general
permitted insolvent P & I policy holder to borrow funds necessary to satisfy policy’s pay first provision | normal practice for the United States Attorney to cause subpoenas to be issued | permitted insolvent shipowner to borrow funds necessary to satisfy policy’s pay first provision | the court allowed an action by an insolvent insured against the insurance company under an indemnity policy when the insured had contracted to satisfy a judgment although the insured had not actually performed the contract | the court allowed an action by an insolvent insured against the insurance company under an indemnity policy when the insured had contracted to satisfy a judgment although the insured had not actually performed the contract | normal practice for the United States Attorney to cause subpoenas to be issued | “the prosecutor is in control of grand jury proceedings”
Citator
- Cited by
- 47 opinions
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.