Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Duncan v. Brondes Ford Sales, Inc.

439 U.S. 866

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1978-10-02
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • violation is “agreement to fix the price to be charged in transactions with third parties, not between the contracting parties themselves”
  • the per se rule applies to “an agreement to fix the price to be charged in transactions with third parties, not between the contracting parties themselves”
  • sexual assault by security guard while at work not within scope of guard’s employment
  • the per se rule applies to “an agreement to fix the price to be charged in transactions with third parties, not between the contrasting parties themselves”
  • “The price-fixing within the scope of the per se prohibition of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, however, is an agreement to fix the price to be charged in transactions with third parties, not between the contracting parties themselves”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Duncan v. Brondes Ford Sales, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
61 opinions

Ct. App. Ohio, Lucas County. Certiorari denied.