Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Duncan v. Brondes Ford Sales, Inc.
439 U.S. 866
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1978-10-02
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- violation is “agreement to fix the price to be charged in transactions with third parties, not between the contracting parties themselves”
- the per se rule applies to “an agreement to fix the price to be charged in transactions with third parties, not between the contracting parties themselves”
- sexual assault by security guard while at work not within scope of guard’s employment
- the per se rule applies to “an agreement to fix the price to be charged in transactions with third parties, not between the contrasting parties themselves”
- “The price-fixing within the scope of the per se prohibition of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, however, is an agreement to fix the price to be charged in transactions with third parties, not between the contracting parties themselves”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Duncan v. Brondes Ford Sales, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 61 opinions
Ct. App. Ohio, Lucas County. Certiorari denied.