Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 639 v. Yellow Bus Lines, Inc.
106 L. Ed. 2d 583
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1989-07-03
- Topic
- general
recognizing the range of views on whether psychologists are competent to give an opinion on future dangerousness | recognizing the range of views on whether psychologists are competent to give an opinion on future dangerousness | noting that criminal defendants generally have the right to plead guilty to charged offenses | refusing to construe Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution as a due process clause | discussing criminal defendant's traditional right in Oregon to waive right to jury trial by pleading guilty | discussing criminal defendant’s traditional right in Oregon to waive right to jury trial by pleading guilty | discussing criminal defendant’s traditional right in Oregon to waive right to jury trial by pleading guilty | interpreting “probability” in second question to mean “more likely than not” | discussing harmlessness of cumulative evidence in context of an illegal search | judgment in 305 Or. 115, 752 P.2d 1136 vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Penry | judgment in 305 Or. 115, 752 P.2d 1136 vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Penry | the ballot title prepared by this court makes “crystal clear” the proper interpretation of a constitutional provision | the ballot title prepared by this court makes "crystal clear" the proper interpretation of a constitutional provision
Citator
- Cited by
- 52 opinions
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co., ante, p. 229. Justice Stevens would deny certiorari.