Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Dougherty v. Haaland
Dougherty v. Haaland, 444 U.S. 992 (1979)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1979-12-10
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- Virginia riparian owner not entitled to damages for diminished value because of pollution of water by municipality
- unattractive use to which city put James River may have detrimental effect on value of property along shore but does not constitute due process violation
- automatic termination of an oil and gas lease for nonpayment of delay rental does not constitute a "proceeding" within the meaning of Bankruptcy Act § 11(e), 11 U.S.C. § 29(e)
- the alleged pollution of the James River and damages to adjoining landowners caused by a sewage plant does not involve traditional maritime jurisdiction and does not confer admiralty jurisdiction
- automatic termination of an oil and gas lease for nonpayment of delay rental does not constitute a “proceeding” within the meaning of Bankruptcy Act s 11(e), 11 U.S.C. s 29(e)
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Dougherty v. Haaland. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 50 opinions
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.