Diorio v. Kreisler-Borg Construction Co.

quoted in United States v. 119.67 Acres of Land, 663 F.2d 1328, 1330 (5th Cir.1981) | quoted in United States v. 119.67 Acres of Land, 663 F.2d 1328, 1330 (5th Cir.1981) | vexatious litigation brought as a part of a scheme of unfair trade practices falls within the sham exception | grant of voluntary departure with an alternative of deportation provides sufficient custody to support petition for habeas | “a factual basis is not required to be established to accept a nolo contendere plea” | where there has been substantial compliance, failure to comply with each and every requirement of § 39-19 does not require automatic vacating of defendant’s plea | substantial compliance with court rule for acceptance of guilty plea sufficient | substantial compliance with court rule for acceptance of guilty plea sufficient | substantial compliance with court rule for acceptance of guilty plea sufficient | substantial compliance with court rule for acceptance of guilty plea sufficient | substantial compliance with court rule for acceptance of guilty plea 1031, 101 S.Ct. 1741 , 68 L.Ed.2d 226 (1981) (substantial compliance with court rule for acceptance of guilty plea sufficient); but see Resnick v. Civil Service Commission , 156 Conn. 28 , 32-33 , 238 A.2d 391 (1968