Deluca, an Infant, by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Deluca v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

approvingly quoting Exxon Corp. v. Chick Kam Choo, 817 F.2d 307 (5th Cir.1987), rev’d, 486 U.S. 140, 108 S.Ct. 1684, 100 L.Ed.2d 127 (1988) | finding that AERs “are not of a type of data that are reasonably relied upon by experts in the fields of epidemiology and public health to make a determination of the causal relationship between a given substance and human birth defects” | enjoining plaintiffs from bringing any further litigation based on the underlying facts in case, including future litigation in state courts | finding that AERs “are not of a type of data that are reasonably relied upon by experts in the fields of epidemiology and public health to make a determination of the causal relationship between a given substance and human birth defects” | enjoining the plaintiff from instituting any new proceedings based on the facts underlying this dispute in any federal court, in any Texas state court, or in any other state court | enjoining the plaintiff from instituting any new proceedings based on the facts underlying this dispute in any federal court, in any Texas state court, or in any other state court | quot ing Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Commercial Cas. Consultants, Inc., 976 F.2d 272, 274-75 (5th Cir.1992 | where disposal occurred as a result of an accidental spill by a transporter, the person that hired the transporter did not "arrange for” the disposal | court may not disregard the express language of an employment contract and read into the agreement expectations of employment not supported by the contractual language used by the parties | court may not disregard the express language of an employment contract and read into the agreement expectations of employment not supported by the contractual language used by the parties