Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Davis v. Board of School Commissioners

425 U.S. 944

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1976-04-19
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that disqualification on the basis of bias or prejudice or lack of impartiality should focus on the party rather than counsel
  • Section 144 and new section 455 are to be construed in pari materia and same substantive test of bias would be applied.
  • controversy between lawyer and judge over the propriety of the lawyer’s use of a class action device did not suggest bias against the client
  • vessel owner negligent when longshoreman slipped and fell on snow allowed to accumulate on deck of ship
  • the fact that judge was acquainted with witnesses and defense counsel did not require recusal
  • bias-in-fact standard governs all motions to disqualify under sections 144, 455(b)(1) and 455(a)
  • distinctly non-collaborators with the Soviet Union were the objects of electronic surveillance
  • also referred to as the “pervasive bias exception” to the extrajudicial source rule

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Davis v. Board of School Commissioners. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
239 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari.