Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Davis v. Board of School Commissioners
425 U.S. 944
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1976-04-19
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that disqualification on the basis of bias or prejudice or lack of impartiality should focus on the party rather than counsel
- Section 144 and new section 455 are to be construed in pari materia and same substantive test of bias would be applied.
- controversy between lawyer and judge over the propriety of the lawyer’s use of a class action device did not suggest bias against the client
- vessel owner negligent when longshoreman slipped and fell on snow allowed to accumulate on deck of ship
- the fact that judge was acquainted with witnesses and defense counsel did not require recusal
- bias-in-fact standard governs all motions to disqualify under sections 144, 455(b)(1) and 455(a)
- distinctly non-collaborators with the Soviet Union were the objects of electronic surveillance
- also referred to as the “pervasive bias exception” to the extrajudicial source rule
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Davis v. Board of School Commissioners. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 239 opinions
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari.