Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Danial Siebert v. Alabama

497 U.S. 1032

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-06-28
Topic
bankruptcy

showing of pretrial publicity in each case inadequate to presume prejudice; actual prejudice standard applied | Florida’s limiting construction that required the murder to be a “conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily tortuous to the victim” was approved | since trial judge and habeas judge were the same person, state judge is ordinarily in a better position to assess the facts | “Counsel’s failure to except to the reinstruction is indicative of an acceptance .... Under these circumstances, defense counsel has failed to preserve the challenge to the court’s instructions” | “Counsel’s failure to except to the reinstruction is indicative of an acceptance____Under these circumstances, defense counsel has failed to preserve the challenge to the court’s instructions” | nine photographs of the gunshot wound to the victim's face were admissible | multiple murders by one act, scheme, or course of conduct

Citator

Cited by
72 opinions

497 U.S. 1032

110 S.Ct. 3297

111 L.Ed.2d 806

Danial SIEBERT, petitioner
v.
ALABAMA.

No. 89-7528.

Case below, Ala.Cr.App., 555 So.2d 772; 555 So.2d 780.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama.

1

June 28, 1990. Denied.

2

Justice BRENNAN and Justice MARSHALL dissenting:

3

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 227, 231, 96 S.Ct. 2909, 2950, 2973, 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case.