Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen
Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen, 512 U.S. 1288 (1994)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1994-09-26
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that although Sec. 402(b) applies to amendments, it does not apply to terminations
- holding that although § 402(b) applies to amendments, it does not apply to terminations
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 33 opinions
C. A. 3d Cir. Motions of Chamber of Commerce of the United States and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, November 8, 1994. Brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, December 6, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on