Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Cox v. Colorado

Cox v. Colo., 282 U.S. 807 (1930)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1930-12-08
Topic
general

Per "Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Bailey *808v. Alabama, 211 U. S. 452, 453; Matter of Gregory, 219 U. S. 210; Harlan v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cox v. Colorado. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
Per "Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Bailey *808 v. Alabama, 211 U. S. 452, 453; Matter of Gregory, 219 U. S. 210; Harlan v. McGourin, 218 U. S. 442; Riddle v. Dyche, 262 U. S. 333, 335, 336; Craig v. Hecht, 263 U. S. 255, 277; Goto v. Lane, 265 U. S. 393; Knewel v. Egan, 268 U. S. 442.

Messrs. James H. Brown and M. W. Spaulding for appellant. Messrs. John S. Underwood, Attorney General of Colorado, Colin A. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, and Jack Garrett Scott, were on the brief, for appellee.