Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S. A.
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S. A., 562 U.S. 40 (Supreme Court of the United States 2010)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2010-12-13
- Topic
- general
(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 562 U. S. ____ (2010) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 08–1423 _________________ COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, PETITIONER v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S. A.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 9 opinions
(Slip Opinion) Cite as:562 U. S. ____
(2010) 1
Per Curiam
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to
notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash
ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order
that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
_________________
No. 08–1423
_________________
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, PETITIONER
v. OMEGA, S. A.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
[December 13, 2010]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
JUSTICE KAGAN took no part in the consideration or
decision of this case.