Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Connor v. California
313 U.S. 542
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1941-04-14
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- petitioner failed to show special circumstances why he should have been permitted to raise claims piecemeal
- rule against piecemeal attacks on judgment “admits of some modification under exceptional circumstances”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Connor v. California. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 6 opinions
Per Curiam: Frank S. Connor, pro se.
The appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied. The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is also denied.