Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Connor Et Al. v. Waller, Governor of Mississippi, Et Al.

421 U.S. 656

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1975-06-05
Topic
antitrust

How later courts describe this case

  • applying § 5 of the Voting Rights Act to pew Mississippi statutes
  • district court erred in determining questions of constitutionality of legislative act which had not been precleared under Section 5 and was not “effective as law”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Connor Et Al. v. Waller, Governor of Mississippi, Et Al.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
94 opinions
CONNORv. WALLER,421 U.S. 656(1975)
CONNOR ET AL.v. WALLER, GOVERNOR OF MISSISSIPPI, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI.
No. 74-1509.
Decided June 5, 1975.
The District Court's error in holding that certain Mississippi statutes do not have to be submitted for clearance pursuant to § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and its consequent error in deciding the constitutional challenges to the statutes based on racial discrimination claims, require reversal; but this is without prejudice to that court's authority to entertain an appropriate proceeding to require that the 1975 elections be conducted pursuant to a court-ordered reapportionment plan.396 F. Supp. 1308, reversed.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered May 22, 1975, by a three-judge court for the Southern District of Mississippi. The judgment is reversed. The District Court erred in holding that House Bill No. 1290 and Senate Bill No. 2976, Mississippi Laws, 1975, Regular Session, are not legislative enactments required to be submitted pursuant to § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965,79 Stat. 439, as amended,84 Stat. 315,42 U.S.C. § 1973c.Georgiav.United States,411 U.S. 526(1973). Those Acts are not now and will not be effective as laws until and unless cleared pursuant to § 5. The District Court accordingly also erred in deciding the constitutional challenges to the Acts based upon claims of racial discrimination.Perkinsv.Matthews,400 U.S. 379(1971);Allenv.State Board ofElections,393 U.S. 544(1969).

This reversal is, however, without prejudice to the authority of the District Court, if it should become appropriate,Page 657to entertain a proceeding to require the conduct of the 1975 elections pursuant to a court-ordered reapportionment plan that complies with this Court's decisions inMahanv.Howell,410 U.S. 315(1973);Connorv.Williams,404 U.S. 549(1972); andChapmanv.Meier,420 U.S. 1(1975).Reversed.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL, concurring.
I am of the opinion that theper curiamin this case should be made clear by adding a paragraph similar to the concluding paragraph of our opinion inGeorgiav.United States,411 U.S. 526,541(1973). Therefore, I would add the following paragraph in this case:
"The case is remanded with instructions that any future elections in Mississippi under House Bill No. 1290 and Senate Bill No. 2976, Mississippi Laws, 1975, Regular Session, be enjoined unless and until the State, pursuant to § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, tenders to the Attorney General a plan to which he does not object, or obtains a favorable declaratory judgment from the District Court for the District of Columbia."


MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.Page 658